fastp an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor, bioRxiv, 2018-03-02

AbstractMotivationQuality control and preprocessing of FASTQ files are essential to providing clean data for downstream analysis. Traditionally, a different tool is used for each operation, such as quality control, adapter trimming, and quality filtering. These tools are often insufficiently fast as most are developed using high-level programming languages (e.g., Python and Java) and provide limited multi-threading support. Reading and loading data multiple times also renders preprocessing slow and IO inefficient.ResultsWe developed fastp as an ultra-fast FASTQ preprocessor with useful quality control and data-filtering features. It can perform quality control, adapter trimming, quality filtering, per-read quality cutting, and many other operations with a single scan of the FASTQ data. It also supports unique molecular identifier preprocessing, poly tail trimming, output splitting, and base correction for paired-end data. It can automatically detect adapters for single-end and paired-end FASTQ data. This tool is developed in C++ and has multi-threading support. Based on our evaluation, fastp is 2–5 times faster than other FASTQ preprocessing tools such as Trimmomatic or Cutadapt despite performing far more operations than similar tools.Availability and ImplementationThe open-source code and corresponding instructions are available at <jatsext-link xmlnsxlink=httpwww.w3.org1999xlink ext-link-type=uri xlinkhref=httpsgithub.comOpenGenefastp>httpsgithub.comOpenGenefastp<jatsext-link>Contactchen@haplox.com

biorxiv bioinformatics 100-200-users 2018

Best Practices for Benchmarking Germline Small Variant Calls in Human Genomes, bioRxiv, 2018-02-24

AbstractAssessing accuracy of NGS variant calling is immensely facilitated by a robust benchmarking strategy and tools to carry it out in a standard way. Benchmarking variant calls requires careful attention to definitions of performance metrics, sophisticated comparison approaches, and stratification by variant type and genome context. The Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) Benchmarking Team has developed standardized performance metrics and tools for benchmarking germline small variant calls. This team includes representatives from sequencing technology developers, government agencies, academic bioinformatics researchers, clinical laboratories, and commercial technology and bioinformatics developers for whom benchmarking variant calls is essential to their work. Benchmarking variant calls is a challenging problem for many reasons<jatslist list-type=bullet><jatslist-item>Evaluating variant calls requires complex matching algorithms and standardized counting because the same variant may be represented differently in truth and query callsets.<jatslist-item><jatslist-item>Defining and interpreting resulting metrics such as precision (aka positive predictive value = TP(TP+FP)) and recall (aka sensitivity = TP(TP+FN)) requires standardization to draw robust conclusions about comparative performance for different variant calling methods.<jatslist-item><jatslist-item>Performance of NGS methods can vary depending on variant types and genome context; and as a result understanding performance requires meaningful stratification.<jatslist-item><jatslist-item>High-confidence variant calls and regions that can be used as “truth” to accurately identify false positives and negatives are difficult to define, and reliable calls for the most challenging regions and variants remain out of reach.<jatslist-item>We have made significant progress on standardizing comparison methods, metric definitions and reporting, as well as developing and using truth sets. Our methods are publicly available on GitHub (<jatsext-link xmlnsxlink=httpwww.w3.org1999xlink ext-link-type=uri xlinkhref=httpsgithub.comga4ghbenchmarking-tools>httpsgithub.comga4ghbenchmarking-tools<jatsext-link>) and in a web-based app on precisionFDA, which allow users to compare their variant calls against truth sets and to obtain a standardized report on their variant calling performance. Our methods have been piloted in the precisionFDA variant calling challenges to identify the best-in-class variant calling methods within high-confidence regions. Finally, we recommend a set of best practices for using our tools and critically evaluating the results.

biorxiv genomics 100-200-users 2018

Genetic meta-analysis identifies 9 novel loci and functional pathways for Alzheimer’s disease risk, bioRxiv, 2018-02-21

AbstractLate onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia with more than 35 million people affected worldwide, and no curative treatment available. AD is highly heritable and recent genome-wide meta-analyses have identified over 20 genomic loci associated with AD, yet only explaining a small proportion of the genetic variance indicating that undiscovered loci exist. Here, we performed the largest genome-wide association study of clinically diagnosed AD and AD-by-proxy (71,880 AD cases, 383,378 controls). AD-by-proxy status is based on parental AD diagnosis, and showed strong genetic correlation with AD (rg=0.81). Genetic meta analysis identified 29 risk loci, of which 9 are novel, and implicating 215 potential causative genes. Independent replication further supports these novel loci in AD. Associated genes are strongly expressed in immune-related tissues and cell types (spleen, liver and microglia). Furthermore, gene-set analyses indicate the genetic contribution of biological mechanisms involved in lipid-related processes and degradation of amyloid precursor proteins. We show strong genetic correlations with multiple health-related outcomes, and Mendelian randomisation results suggest a protective effect of cognitive ability on AD risk. These results are a step forward in identifying more of the genetic factors that contribute to AD risk and add novel insights into the neurobiology of AD to guide new drug development.

biorxiv genetics 100-200-users 2018

 

Created with the audiences framework by Jedidiah Carlson

Powered by Hugo